ASTM E399-12e1

5.1.1 Variation in the value of K_Ic can be expected within the allowable range of specimen proportions, a/W and W/B. K_Ic may also be expected to rise with increasing ligament size. Notwithstanding these variations, however, K_Ic is believed to represent a lower limiting value of fracture toughness (for 2 % apparent crack extension) in the environment and at the speed and temperature of the test.

5.1.2 Lower values of K_Ic can be obtained for materials that fail by cleavage fracture; for example, ferritic steels in the ductile-to-brittle transition region or below, where the crack front length affects the measurement in a stochastic manner independent of crack front constraint. The present test method does not apply to such materials and the user is referred to Test Method E1921 and E1820. Likewise this test method does not apply to high toughness or high tearing-resistance materials whose failure is accompanied by appreciable amounts of plasticity. Guidance on testing elastic-plastic materials is given in Test Method E1820.

5.1.3 The value of K_Ic obtained by this test method may be used to estimate the relation between failure stress and crack size for a material in service wherein the conditions of high constraint described above would be expected. Background information concerning the basis for development of this test method in terms of linear elastic fracture mechanics may be found in Refs (1) and (3).

5.1.4 Cyclic forces can cause crack extension at K_I values less than K_Ic. Crack extension under cyclic or sustained forces (as by stress corrosion cracking or creep crack growth) can be influenced by temperature and environment. Therefore, when K_Ic is applied to the design of service components, differences between laboratory test and field conditions shall be considered.

5.1.5 Plane-strain fracture toughness testing is unusual in that there can be no advance assurance that a valid K _Ic will be determined in a particular test. Therefore, compliance with the specified validity criteria of this test method is essential.

5.1.6 Residual stresses can adversely affect the indicated K_Q and K_Ic values. The effect can be especially significant for specimens removed from as-heat treated or otherwise non-stress relieved stock, from weldments, from complex wrought parts, or from parts with intentionally induced residual stresses. Indications of residual stress include distortion during specimen machining, results that are specimen configuration dependent, and irregular fatigue precrack growth (either excessive crack front curvature or out-of-plane growth). Guide B909 provides supplementary guidelines for plane strain fracture toughness testing of aluminum alloy products for which complete stress relief is not practicable. Guide B909 includes additional guidelines for recognizing when residual stresses may be significantly biasing test results, methods for minimizing the effects of residual stress during testing, and guidelines for correction and interpretation of data.

5.2.1 In research and development, to establish in quantitative terms significant to service performance, the effects of metallurgical variables such as composition or heat treatment, or of fabricating operations such as welding or forming, on the fracture toughness of new or existing materials.

5.2.2 In service evaluation, to establish the suitability of a material for a specific application for which the stress conditions are prescribed and for which maximum flaw sizes can be established with confidence.

FIG. 2 Double–Cantilever Clip-In Displacement Gage Showing Mounting by Means of Integral Knife Edges (Gage Design Details are Given in Annex A1)

5.2.3 For specifications of acceptance and manufacturing quality control, but only when there is a sound basis for specifying minimum K_Ic values, and then only if the dimensions of the product are sufficient to provide specimens of the size required for valid K_Ic determination. The specification of K _Ic values in relation to a particular application should signify that a fracture control study has been conducted for the component in relation to the expected loading and environment, and in relation to the sensitivity and reliability of the crack detection procedures that are to be applied prior to service and subsequently during the anticipated life.